PDA

View Full Version : Australian Force Protection Measures



buglerbilly
02-06-10, 07:30 AM
Force Protection Measures 01 June 2010

Protection of our soldiers in Afghanistan is one of the Government’s highest priorities, which is continuously reviewed by Defence. The Government and Defence are working to ensure that our troops have the full range of force protection measures they need to undertake their difficult mission.

In July 2009, shortly after becoming the Minister for Defence and visiting Afghanistan for the first time, I asked the Chief of the Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, to carry out a review of the force protection measures available for our deployed troops.

The review was conducted by the Chief of Joint Operations (CJOPS), Lieutenant General Mark Evans. It included direct discussions with our troops in theatre about their force protection needs and an assessment of the effectiveness of previous and on-going force protection initiatives.

CJOPS’s report was reviewed by the Chief of the Defence Force who tasked the Vice Chief of the Defence Force, Lieutenant General David Hurley, to design a decision-making framework for Government consideration.

The outcome of this work put forward 48 recommendations for enhancements to our force protection measures, particularly reflecting the escalating improvised explosive device (IED) and rocket attacks in Oruzgan Province. It ensured a coherent, comprehensive and complete approach to force protection.

The force protection improvements recommended from the review cover a variety of active and passive measures, which range from personal protective equipment for our soldiers, to unmanned surveillance systems.

Since the review was completed, Defence has been working hard to progress and implement the outcomes of the Force Protection Review.

Some measures have already been implemented, including improving counter measures against IEDs and improving IED detection equipment.

Progressing the other recommendations is well underway, including enhanced medical support, the upgrading and hardening of living and working accommodation in Tarin Kowt, as well as other capability enhancements.

Other measures required additional budget funding, which was provided in the Budget.

A key initiative in the package is the acquisition of a C-RAM system for use in Afghanistan, which provides advance warning of rocket attacks. This is a timely and important protective measure which will increase the security for troops in Tarin Kowt and elsewhere.

The approved force protection Budget measures, costing a total of $1.1 billion, will minimise the vulnerability of personnel, facilities and equipment so that our deployed forces enjoy more freedom of action in support of Afghan National Security Forces.

In addition to the $1.1 billion in the specific Force Protection Budget measure, Defence has also received $485 million for force protection through Operation Slipper supplementation which traditionally funds ongoing aspects of operations including force protection. Further ongoing operating costs for force protection initiatives of $48 million will be sought in the context of future budgets.

The attached table sets out the initiatives included in the Force Protection package and indicates their funding sources, including budget measures, funding from prior year and current year operational supplementation, and future operating costs for which Defence will seek supplementation through the usual process in future budgets.

I am satisfied that we are doing all we can to protect our troops. Even so, as the threats to our soldiers evolve, so too must our force protection arrangements.

FORCE PROTECTION INITIATIVES

Counter IED
Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) are responsible for a substantial number of coalition casualties in Afghanistan. The threat is indiscriminate and not only kills and maims coalition and local security forces, but also targets the local civilian population. Insurgents constantly adapt their use of these measures, so the counter measures required need to constantly change.

Route clearance tasks are undertaken for the conduct of combat operations and the sustainment of logistic supply routes. The ADF has procured a quantity of Self-protection Adaptive Roller Kits (SPARK roller) to mitigate the risk to vehicle mounted troops from IEDs.

Explosive Detection Dogs (EDDs) are used to locate and identify potential IEDs, explosive hides and other areas of interest. Additional Military Working Dogs will begin training next financial year.

The following measures will assist in protecting our troops from this significant IED threat:
· Initiatives that will improve the ADF’s route clearance capability, at a cost of $7.0 million.
· Seven initiatives dealing with enhanced counter measure capabilities for the Middle East Area of Operations.
· Additional military working dogs will be trained for counter IED purposes at a cost of $4.9 million.
· All Services will receive IED training as part of the ADF’s training continuum, building on the Army Explosive Hazards Awareness Training that began in January 2009.

Enhanced Electronic Counter Measures and Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance
The ADF is operating in a progressively more complex environment and requires enhanced Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities for the prosecution of operations. Improved ISR capabilities will enhance and extend our area of influence and our ability to detect adversaries.

New capabilities and enhancements include Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles, Unattended Ground Sensors and Remote Viewing Terminals.

Many of these capabilities will be unmanned, allowing intelligence and data to be gathered without the ADF being placed in dangerous situations. Deployed forces will be able to gather and combine new types of information to better target and apprehend the enemy.

Improved sensors and remote viewing terminals will give our troops greater awareness of the battlespace, enhancing decision-making and reducing the risk to our troops and civilian casualties.

Improved dissemination will ensure that intelligence travels quickly and directly to our operational commanders providing them with clear and concise situational awareness. Enhanced intelligence and reconnaissance capabilities allow information to be gathered beyond line of sight without detection, allowing adversaries to be identified before contact can occur.

The total cost of ISR capabilities included in the Force Protection Review is $740 million, including the following measures:
· An initiative to increase the rate of effort of ISR capability currently used in theatre. This will be at a cost of $370.9 million.
· Nine intelligence related capabilities including new biometrics capabilities and a minimal cost initiative to incorporate forensics into tactical planning at a cost of $370 million.

The Force Protection Review also includes funding for the continued enhancement of electronic counter measures totalling $188.4 million.

Protection from Indirect Fire
Taliban rocket attacks are an ongoing threat for our personnel in Afghanistan. Enhancing protection from such attacks is vital. The ADF has already suffered one casualty from a rocket attack and such attacks continue against the base at Tarin Kowt, most recently on 28 April and 6 May 2010.

To improve the levels of protection against these attacks, the Government has approved the acquisition of a Counter-Rocket, Artillery and Mortar system. This will provide a ‘sense and warn’ capability which will detect and track these projectiles in flight and warn our forces of the incoming threat.

Elements of the system are planned to be in place by the end of 2010, with subsequent progressive delivery of improved levels of protection.

The total cost of this part of the package is over $393.6 million.


Enhanced personal equipment and preparation
One of this Government’s highest priorities in the Force Protection Review is ensuring that our troops in Afghanistan are appropriately prepared and equipped for the challenging tasks they face.

The Government has approved a comprehensive package of measures to enhance the survivability, lethality and preparedness of our troops.

This includes funding for new weapons, body armour, improved communications and logistics arrangements, at a total cost of $55.6 million. These include:
· The upgrade of night fighting equipment to enable more effective night operations at a cost of $10.2 million.
· Enhancement of training areas in Australia to assist in better Mission Rehearsal Training before deploying. This will cost $1.3 million.
· A range of enhancements to current issued body armour and an enhanced weapons system, in response to operational feedback, to improve soldier performance across a range of operational tasks. The procurement of a quantity of interim body armour systems will provide scalable levels of protection and a quantity of specialised body armour systems to meet Special Operations Task Group (SOTG) specific operational requirements at a cost of $35.9 million.
· Improvements to the logistics process to make the system more flexible and capable of responding to changes in the operational environment.
· Remote Viewing Terminals are being introduced which will provide the commander on the ground situation awareness and allow him to make faster and better decisions.
· Investigation of a more timely logistics support and re-supply system.
· A communications capability that will assist information and data exchange in theatre at a cost of $5.7 million.
· A force integration team to incorporate equipment and tactics changes in theatre.
· The Government will also implement measures to ensure that in the future any new equipment identified as necessary for our troops to complete their mission safely is acquired and reaches them without unnecessary delay.


Increased Armour and Firepower for Vehicles
The Force Protection Review will deliver enhancements to the survivability and lethality of the Protected Mobility Vehicles and ASLAVs our troops rely on in combat in Afghanistan, at a cost of $271.5 million.


Looking after the Health of our Troops
The threats to our deployed personnel are serious. As at 26 May 2010, 126 Australian soldiers have been wounded in the course of battle. The Government is committed to ensuring we successfully fulfil our mission and see our servicemen and women return home safely. For our wounded soldiers, our aim is to ensure that the individual’s health needs are managed to the highest standard. The following six measures will provide better health protection for our deployed forces.
· Hearing protection to facilitate noise reduction. This initiative looks at acquiring additional weapon noise suppressors at a cost of $0.6 million.
· Implementation of a buddy system for mental health identification at a cost of $1.9 million.
· Trialling of a decompression program to help assist in soldier’s adjusting from operations to being back home. This will cost $1.8 million.
· The establishment of a combat medical advanced skills training (CMAST) facility within Australia. This will cost $4.1 million and will be up and running by 2012.
· Additional Hearing Protection Hearing Tests have been agreed, with additional post deployment screening tests being rolled out as part of the broader medical checks. This cost will be absorbed by Defence.
· This initiative is also looking at providing additional combat medics for infantry platoons. This cost will be absorbed by Defence.

FUNDING

The force protection package comprises investment of $1.6 billion over 2009-10 to 2012-13.

This is being funded by a total of $1.1bn from the Force Protection Review budget measure including new funding of $223.6 million. Defence has also received an additional $485 million for Force Protection through Operation Slipper supplementation which traditionally funds ongoing aspects of operations including force protection. Further ongoing operating costs for force protection initiatives of $48 million will be sought in the context of future budgets.

Below is a table which sets out the Force Protection package and indicates its funding sources, including budget measures, funding from prior year and current year operational supplementation, and future operating costs for which Defence will seek supplementation through the usual process in future budgets.

Increased Armour and Fire Power for Vehicles
· Upgrade Protected Mobility Vehicle (PMV) Fleet
· Additional firepower for PMVs
· Enhanced Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) vehicle protection
· Increased protection level for ASLAV

Counter Improvised Explosive Device (IED)
· Improved route clearance capability
· Electronic Countermeasures
· Additional Military Working Dogs
· Counter IED Training
· Exploitation analysis and targeting
· Forensic analysis capability

Enhanced Electronic Countermeasures (ECM)
· A package of classified Electronic Countermeasures upgrades and capability acquisitions

Looking after the Health of our Troops
· Additional Combat medics at Platoon level
· A “Buddy System” for Mental Health identification
· A trial of a Decompression Program for personnel returning from operations
· Establish a combat medical advanced skills training facility
· Hearing protection and Hearing Protection Testing

Protection against Indirect Fire
· Indirect Fire sense and warn capability – Counter Rocket, Artillery and Mortar (CRAM)
· Physical Force Protection Measures – Facilities hardening

Enhanced Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance (ISR)
· An initiative to increase the rate of effort of ISR in theatre
· Intelligence related capabilities including new Biometric capabilities
· A range of classified ISR enhancements

Enhanced Personal Equipment and Preparation
· Replacement helmets
· Improved Body Armour
· Enhanced Night Fighting Equipment
· Classified Special Operations Weapon System
· Training Areas, Ranges and Equipment suited to operations in Afghanistan
· Tactical Data Transfer Capability between deployed forces
· Improving logistic and sustainment agility
· Remote viewing terminal
· More timely logistics support
· Staffing and funding support to operationally urgent capability requests
· Creating a force integration team for incorporating equipment and tactics changes in theatre

You want to see the monies allowed and when, go here to the original notice.............

http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/Faulknertpl.cfm?CurrentId=10360

Exsandgroper
02-07-10, 08:18 AM
Senator the Hon John Faulkner
Minister for Defence

02 Jul 2010

MIN77/10


Uruzgan C-RAM Force protection contract signed


Minister for Defence, Senator John Faulkner, today announced that the Defence Materiel Organisation has signed a contract with Saab AB for the lease of a Giraffe radar system for urgent deployment to Afghanistan.


"The Giraffe Agile Multi Beam radar is one key component of Defence's Counter Rocket Artillery and Mortar (C-RAM) capability," Senator Faulkner said.


“This lease contract will enable the most efficient and rapid delivery of the Giraffe radar system for operational use by Australian Defence Force personnel currently deployed in Afghanistan."


"The Giraffe radar is a most capable system. It provides early detection of attacks from enemy rockets, artillery and mortars. When this radar is networked with other equipment that we are procuring under the C-RAM project, friendly forces will benefit from the early warning against such attacks, improving force protection," said Senator Faulkner.


The lease contract value is approximately $32 million and includes a full logistic support package. The lease is an interim measure while the Defence Materiel Organisation advances the acquisition of additional radar systems for progressive introduction into service.

Cheers

SteveJH
02-07-10, 10:37 AM
Now if they could just spring to a couple of Phalanx units as well......

Gubler, A.
04-07-10, 10:06 AM
Now if they could just spring to a couple of Phalanx units as well......

I think you would need more than a couple to provide coverage to Kamp Holland from incoming attack. The Phlanx C-RAM can only protect a circle with a radius of 600m... Really the ADF should have orderd the Elta EL/M-2084 radar instead of the ABM. This could then have been upgraded with an OTS capability to manage the Iron Dome missile interceptor. The Elta radar would have been a lot cheaper which would have defrayed any add on cost form not using Saab System Pty.Ltd. and leveraging the Navy investment in similar AMB radars. But that would require actually having all those buzz words that the DoD refers to in its leadership and management pubs.

SteveJH
04-07-10, 10:49 AM
Either way, the system they are purchasing is not C-RAM, but rather RAMDS (Rocket and Mortar Detection System).

Gubler, A.
04-07-10, 11:39 AM
Either way, the system they are purchasing is not C-RAM, but rather RAMDS (Rocket and Mortar Detection System).

Not all C-RAM is the same. For example at Kamp Holland right to the north of it is Tarin Kwot and Shai Baba. So if you're a Taliban and you are rocketing the base from the north (Baulci Valley) any close range (1-2km) C-RAM interception (like Phalanx) would result in all the debris landing on the town. Not good for winning hearts and minds. For a base so close to the locals you need a system that can intercept the threat at its apogee and quite high up (like Iron Dome).

Gubler, A.
28-09-10, 11:19 AM
There is an interesting article in the current Army News about the rapid acquisition C-RAM capability. The mortar locating radars and the Giraffe AMB are supposed to be in theatre by the end of the year. The mortar radars will be mounted on some kind of a mobile tower which will provide coverage of FOBs. The leased G-AMB will be mounted on a “tracked light armoured vehicle” despite no such system existing. G-AMBs are mounted on truck shelters or on a 10x10 Piranha (LAV) developed for the Swedish Coastal Artillery. There are a few pictures of the 10x10 Piranha so I would image Army News have just got their wires crossed on the tracked part. By 2012 the Australian owned G-AMBs will be delivered and they will be mounted on trucks.

Also the C-RAM capability will be manned by 16 AD Regt which will convert to a new “Air Land Regiment” structure. Also of interest is HQ 6 Bde which has a "Colonel Joint Fires" or in olden day speak "Commander Division Artillery". So Arty now has a high level HQ that can link together a few arty capabilities and conduct high level (>2 regt) fire missions.

Raven22
28-09-10, 11:30 AM
Also the C-RAM capability will be manned by 16 AD Regt which will convert to a new “Air Land Regiment” structure. Also of interest is HQ 6 Bde which has a "Colonel Joint Fires" or in olden day speak "Commander Division Artillery". So Arty now has a high level HQ that can link together a few arty capabilities and conduct high level (>2 regt) fire missions.

It aligns with the new arty regiment structure as well. I can't remember exact names, but the new regiment has one fires battery (with three 4-gun troops) and three 'control' (can't remember the name) batteries that house the JOSTs, JFCCs etc, and that are designed to be attached to the battlegroups. It looks strange when an artillery regiment has four batteries but only one has guns. You're hard pressed to find a digger in an arty regiment that isn't an FO these days.

Gubler, A.
28-09-10, 11:43 AM
Nah it’s a good thing.

A traditional field artillery battery consisted of two main elements: the Battery Commander’s element and the Battery (K)aptain’s element. The BC attached himself to the battalion HQ with a fires coordination cell (JFCC: a rare case of an acronym being shortened with offensive support replaced by fires, thankyou America) and the forward observer parties (now called JOSTs). The BK would then go off with the guns and manage them meeting the fire mission requirements set by the BC. Now with the new digital long range guns there is no need for much of the BK’s extensive operation of recce parties, command posts, survey teams, etc and the close concentration of a battery of guns together in a single place. So all that has happened is the guns have been consolidated and the higher end of the field battery stays the same – except of course grown to provide more JOSTs.

There is also a combat support battery (ex HQ Battery) which is commanded by the regt operations officer and provides bde level capabilities for arty. The HNA arty regt was kind of a half way house from the traditional to the new structure. I wrote a bit about it being a very bloated organisation for new capability of the new guns and BMS-F so am pretty happy that change has come.

Raven22
28-09-10, 12:37 PM
About all I know about arty batteries is how they look in the thermal when I am destroying them during a typical daring cavalry raid...

JimWH
28-09-10, 12:48 PM
About all I know about arty batteries is how they look in the thermal when I am destroying them during a typical daring cavalry raid...

I now have the mental image of you riding in on horse back brandishing a sabre and a truly epic handlebar mustache.

And I must say that the new arty structure makes sense: attach the people to the BGs in a way which maximizes the knowledge of offensive fire support up forward with the infantry/cavalry, and then attaches the guns to the knowledgeable people more flexibly. I'd imagine that it'll take a while for everyone to get used to, but I can see the merit in the plan.

And whilst I remember, wasn't the decision on the SPG due by the end of the last financial year?

Raven22
28-09-10, 12:56 PM
I now have the mental image of you riding in on horse back brandishing a sabre and a truly epic handlebar mustache

It's very hard to fit a thermal to a horse... You're right about the handlebar moustache though - its magnificent.

Gubler, A.
28-09-10, 01:22 PM
I now have the mental image of you riding in on horse back brandishing a sabre and a truly epic handlebar mustache.

My mental image is of an ASLAV being hit by a 105mm HE shell... or the less spectacular near miss perforating the ASLAV and crew with splinters.

JimWH
28-09-10, 01:25 PM
My mental image is of an ASLAV being hit by a 105mm HE shell... or the less spectacular near miss perforating the ASLAV and crew with splinters.

Does Raven's handlebar mustache feature prominently though?

Gubler, A.
28-09-10, 01:41 PM
Does Raven's handlebar mustache feature prominently though?

You can briefly see it above the commander's hatch and the wide open mouth of terror under it as the frieght train sound of death heralds the arrival of a fire mission battery. But then the entire ASLAV, handlebar and all, is consumed by a cloud of dust kicked up the HE.

Raven22
28-09-10, 01:42 PM
My mental image is of an ASLAV being hit by a 105mm HE shell... or the less spectacular near miss perforating the ASLAV and crew with splinters.

My god, you're delusional...

If you can hit a hull down ASLAV at 2000m at night with a Hamel gun, you're a better man than me. If you can hit one before he hits you than you deserve a handlebar moustache of your own.

Gubler, A.
28-09-10, 01:51 PM
Oh you Ironsides can only think in two dimensions. We'd drop a fire mission on top of you long before you got to 2km. If you want to sit still then that just makes it easier. Direct fire and a near miss is good enough. The sides of your ASLAV won't keep out splinters. With the 155s and the SMART round its even easier.

I don't know why the Israelis would shoot airburst HE at a tank apart from it looks pretty good. At 1.58 in this video.

Raven22
28-09-10, 02:35 PM
Oh you Ironsides can only think in two dimensions. We'd drop a fire mission on top of you long before you got to 2km. If you want to sit still then that just makes it easier. Direct fire and a near miss is good enough. The sides of your ASLAV won't keep out splinters. With the 155s and the SMART round its even easier.

You've got to find us first...

The one time I actually did a raid on an arty battery no one even woke up. They were playing the old 'if we don't react then we can pretend we never heard it and keep on sleeping' routine. We seriously considered towing one of their guns away, but we figured they might actually react to that. That's the problem with not having blanks for the 25mm - all they hear is the Flex-58 firing and ignore it. In real life having a couple of hundred 25mm rounds hit your position mixed with a couple of thousand 7.62mm, you would defenently get a reaction. Certainly beats having an umpire tell you that one of your vehicles was destroyed by an 84 round, despite being >1200m away, the enemy only having illum rounds, and the fact they were firing in the wrong direction at what they thought was an M-113 anyway...

Gubler, A.
29-09-10, 10:26 AM
You've got to find us first...

We've all got our free play warries... one time I took out a M113 with an SLR double tap - they left the back hatch open and were screaming 'we're not in this exercise' after the echo chamber effect...

Anyway back to the obj of this thread.

The ORBAT modernisation of the arty is quite impressive. I'm also hearing that 1 GL Gp will be upgraded to spec with a US Army Battlefield Coordination Det (BCD) which is a pretty serious combatant commander level/theatre level Army-Air Force integration agency. So arty will have:

Colonel Joint Fires
1 GL Gp (Colonel level BCD)
16 Air Land Regt (CRAM, GBAD, WLR/airspace control)
20 STA Regt (UAV, GSR, TI)
1, 4, 8/12 Arty Regt with 3x 12 gun fires bty, 7x JFCC/JFO bty, 3x cbt supt bty

Gubler, A.
29-09-10, 12:24 PM
The leased G-AMB will be mounted on a “tracked light armoured vehicle” despite no such system existing. G-AMBs are mounted on truck shelters or on a 10x10 Piranha (LAV) developed for the Swedish Coastal Artillery. There are a few pictures of the 10x10 Piranha so I would image Army News have just got their wires crossed on the tracked part. By 2012 the Australian owned G-AMBs will be delivered and they will be mounted on trucks.

Just followed this issue up and its pretty clear we are getting the PIR 10x10 platform G-AMB. Despite calling it a "tracked light armoured vehicle" Col. Bailey refers to our system as the G-AMB 740. ARTE 740 was the original name given to the Swedish Coastal Artillery PIR 10x10s. The original 740 system used the AMB processor with the older Giraffe 75 antenna. The pictures in Army Spews shows a PIR 10x10 in the ARTE 740 configuration but with the AMB antenna and a new coat of desert yellow paint. So it would appear that the G-AMB 740 is an upgraded ARTE 740. The Swedes built six of these bad boys and their Coastal Artillery doesn't need them anymore since they were disbanded. Hopefully all of our G-AMB 740 systems will be on the PIR 10x10 vehicle because it is full armoured, highly mobile and looks ultra mean.

Ohh yeah and after writing all that I checked the arhives and found this press release from Saab:

News from Saab

The purpose of this contract is to provide a fast tracked acquisition of a capability to detect incoming rockets, artillery and mortars in the vicinity of the Australian base at Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan. This will initiate a warning to personnel to take cover.

This contract involves the remanufacture an existing ARTE 740 2D radar which will be leased to the Australian Defence Force for a period of 15 months. It will be delivered by Saab before the end of 2010 as announced by the Minister for Defence in May and will subsequently be transported to Afghanistan by the ADF.

A subsequent contract will be negotiated for the manufacture of new radars to take over from the leased radar in Afghanistan. One of these radars will be located at Woodside as a training and support system.

The work on this project will be undertaken by Saab’s Electronic Defence Systems factory located near Gothenburg in Sweden. The Head of Electronic Defence Systems business area is Micael Johansson. He is also a member of the Board of Saab Technologies Australia.

The actual contract value is SEK 190 million.