PDA

View Full Version : Work on U.S.-Mexico 'Virtual Fence' Frozen



buglerbilly
19-03-10, 01:57 AM
Work on U.S.-Mexico 'Virtual Fence' Frozen

By william matthews

Published: 18 Mar 2010 19:00

It took 4½ years and $833 million for Boeing and the Department of Homeland Security to erect 28 miles of "virtual fence" along the U.S.-Mexican border.

At that rate, it will take 320 years to finish the job, said Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas.

Or it may never get built, now that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano ordered a spending freeze on the fence, formally known as the Secure Border Initiative Network, or SBInet. Napolitano said the fence project, which is intended to stop drug smugglers and illegal immigrants from entering the United States, is too "plagued with cost overruns and missed deadlines" to continue without a through reassessment.

Meanwhile, $50 million that was to be spent on the fence will instead be spent on other technology to help secure the southern border, Napolitano said.

Boeing was hired in 2006 to install thousands of video and infrared cameras, radars and ground sensors to provide constant surveillance along the U.S.-Mexican border. Computers and software were to combine the intelligence collected by the cameras and sensors to produce a real time picture, day and night, of smugglers and migrants to Border Patrol agents whose job is to intercept them.

And it works - some of the time and in a few locations.

"We are seeing real-world results in actual Border Patrol operations in the Tucson sector," Roger Krone insisted during a March 18 hearing before two House Homeland Security subcommittees. Krone is president of Boeing's network and space systems division.

The subcommittees saw video that appeared to be shot by an infrared camera and was said to show Border Patrol agents intercepting "six backpackers" last month as they carried 200 pounds of marijuana into the United States near Tucson, Ariz.

But success in Tucson doesn't help in Texas, which Rep. Michael McCaul said "has nothing on its border" while "a lot of killings are taking place" on the Mexican side.

"There is a war going on there," McCaul said. The seriousness of the situation was illustrated March 13 by the gang-style slayings of a U.S. consulate worker, her husband and the husband of a Mexican employee of the consulate in Cuidad Juarez, just south of El Paso, Texas.

Last year, more than 6,000 Mexicans were murdered in violence that is largely fueled by illegal trade.

"It's going to spill over into this country," said McCaul, a Republican whose district stretches east from Austin more than 200 miles from the Mexican border. "We can't afford a time-out" to re-evaluate SBInet, he said.

But others on subcommittees said SBInet is too flawed to continue.

Rep. Chris Carney, D-Pa., said that with so little to show for more than $800 million spent, "does it make sense to keep spending" on SBInet? "Do we get a refund?"

Rep. Bennie Thompson, chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, said that despite the time and money spent on SBInet, "we are still without an effective technological tool to secure our borders."

While much of the blame is assigned to Boeing, the contractor, a good deal is also assigned to DHS for inadequate project management.

The Government Accountability Office, which has reviewed SBInet four times, said part of the problem is that key parts of the project "were ambiguous and in a continuous state of flux, making it unclear and uncertain what technology capabilities were to be delivered when."

The program lacked a master schedule, important milestones were allowed to slip and requirements were poorly defined, GAO said.

DHS allowed untested components to be installed and deployed, and the agency's failure to adequately manage testing "increased the risk that the system will not perform as expected and will take longer and cost more than necessary," GAO said.

Testing was so poorly managed that 70 percent of the tests to check SBInet performance were rewritten as they were being given, said Randolph Hite, head of GAO's information technology architecture and systems issues branch.

In some instances, tests were rewritten because the original tests were insufficient or inaccurate. But in other instances, tests were rewritten to ensure that components passed, he said.

Even then, tests turned up 1,333 SBInet defects between March 2008 and July 2009. Finding defects isn't necessarily bad. "The purpose of testing is to find problems," Hite said. "It is a given that you will find problems."

But with SBInet, testing uncovered problems at a faster rate than Boeing could correct them. "Such an upward trend is indicative of an immature system and can indicate a failure to meet system specifications," Hite wrote in a report.

Krone said the discovery of problems was expected. "In many cases, we push the system to failure to understand its detailed functionality and durability."

With SBInet floundering and DHS looking for new border technology, McCaul and other lawmakers say it's time to turn to military technology, particularly unmanned aerial vehicles.

Cuellar said he is working with the Federal Aviation Administration to get DHS permission to fly UAVs along the U.S.-Mexican border. Carney said that at $8 million apiece, DHS could buy several Predator UAVs and still have money from Napolitano's $50 million to spend on other technology.

buglerbilly
17-05-10, 04:20 PM
Technology Continues to Flow to Southwest Border

June 2010 edition

By Stew Magnuson



While the Department of Homeland Security conducts a program review of its troubled border fence program, Customs and Border Protection has not stopped deploying new sensors in the Southwest, said a senior DHS official.

The Secure Border Initiative’s technology piece, known as SBInet, was designed to create “virtual fences” along remote parts of the northern and southern borders. The program suffered delays, setbacks and cost overruns for years, but the Obama administration signaled its intent to proceed with the plan and field a second version of the system of sensors, cameras and a communications backbone that would tie them all together. That was before the airing of a 60 Minutes report that repeated the conclusions of several Government Accountability Office and DHS inspector general investigations that said the system did not work as envisioned. Two days before the broadcast, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano announced that SBInet was on hold and that there would be a sweeping review that would look for possible alternatives to the program.

Nevertheless, the department is continuing to spend money on border technology, CBP Commissioner Alan Bersen told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The agency has spent $50 million of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act money to deploy proven surveillance systems along the border. The bulk of that, $37 million, has been used to purchase several mobile surveillance systems — a suite of sensors mounted on a rugged truck that can be driven to hotspots along the border. The Border Patrol has also received $12.3 million to spend on thermal and backscatter imagers. CBP’s Air and Marine division has received $4.5 million to buy thermal imaging and other cameras for its boats and aircraft.

The key difference is that these are “commercially available, stand-alone” technologies, Bersen testified. No money has been allocated for networking the sensors into a larger communications system.

The comment to this is interesting...............

Re: Technology Continues to Flow to Southwest Border

For all of the money they spend on this, they continue to try the same things over and over again. Racking and Stacking COTS equipment is not a good engineering approach.

I'm a computer vision researcher and technology exists which can solve this problem. Links are below to some examples. The designers should also be forced to conduct a Phase I investigation which would include extensive research and and training by the Border Control so the engineers know what to design. The typical solution of waiting for a for profit defense contractor to modify some old technology to marginally meet the spec is not efficient.

http://www.personal.psu.edu/djn143/IEEE_Conf_Natale.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZKubwGaPio
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFHJDBKTZV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c60DNbQ1zmo&feature=response_watch

Don on 05/17/2010 at 09:46

buglerbilly
17-05-10, 04:25 PM
Calif. Ranchers Wield British Radar to Detect Illegal Border Crossers

December 2009

By Grace V. Jean



LONDON — Frustrated by trespassers attempting to cross into the United States illegally, ranch owners in southern California have purchased a British radar in an effort to protect their property and to help Border Patrol agents nab more intruders.

The Blighter B202 Radar, developed by Plextek Ltd., an electronics and communications design consultancy based near Cambridge, U.K., detects people walking or crawling through the rocky, hilly landscape from four kilometers away, says Nicholas Booth, manager of Blighter sales and marketing.

The man-portable, scanning radar is mounted on a tripod and runs on rechargeable lithium ion batteries. It has a 20-degree wide vertical elevation beam that permits the detection of targets in the distance as well as up close.

“You can see people walking up and down the mountain and on the plains at the same time,” says Booth.

Traditional radars would require tilting to cover the same area.

When the Blighter radar detects movement, the target is displayed on a map with information on its exact location, size and speed. Other elements of the ranchers’ surveillance system, including day/night cameras, acoustic and warning devices and unattended ground sensors, help to confirm whether the target is human. But the devices are subject to environmental factors that may hinder their effectiveness.

“We regularly experience early morning coastal fog that renders our [infrared] cameras useless,” one of the ranch owners says in a company press release. “Of all the surveillance equipment we use here, the Blighter radar has proven itself to be the most solid, reliable performer of all.”

The radar has been updated with new software, called BlighterTrack, that allows the operator to see the path traveled by the intruder and also filters out false detections triggered by wildlife and other natural occurrences.

Plextek also has developed a technology called Vortex Fast-Scan that accelerates the radars’ scanning speed from once every five seconds to once per second. Revisiting targets every second gives better accuracy, says Booth.

“We have reported many groups of aliens based on Blighter’s alarms alone with which the Border Patrol has made apprehensions,” a rancher says.
The radar system is remotely accessed via the Internet so that the ranchers can control and monitor the system from their homes.

Plextek’s radars are employed mostly by the U.K. Ministry of Defence. But the company is looking to break into the U.S. government market.

“I’m quite hopeful that with the positive feedback from the border guards that we’ll get noticed,” says Booth.

buglerbilly
18-05-10, 02:35 AM
Another country with a major border problem.............and some solutions..........

Ares

A Defense Technology Blog

IDF Deploys Magna Thermal Border Surveillance

Posted by Noam Eshel at 5/16/2010 8:37 AM CDT

Central Command has recently introduced the Magna thermal camera system, providing border surveillance intelligence to sector operation centers and monitoring potential hostile infiltration from suspected areas.



The system, developed by Magna BSP Ltd combines thermal cameras and regular cameras, scanning an area to the range of several miles. Once the system detects suspicious vibrations, it transmits the data to a collection system installed in the look-out operations centers posted in the area. For rapid reaction and riot control, the IDF has introduced the heavily armored Hatehof 'Wolf' armored vehicle, which is offering improved crew protection.



Magna BSP are developers of a passive radar 'Virtual Wall' perimeter protection system, based on a stereoscopic video motion detection system. The system is designed for unattended operation along a perimeter line, or from a central location, protecting strategic facilities and borders as well as airfields and harbors.

The sensor elements are comprised of two vertically-aligned IR micro bolometer cameras linked by the system's processing module to provide accurate and reliable detection of targets, while passively determining the size and location of the objective.

Magna's system include a range of static, panoramic sensor poles each carrying two (stereoscopic) or four (quadroscopic) sensors (two thermal IR and two CCD) covering a 360 degree zone, by staring sensors or scanning sensor poles. The system was selected to provide perimeter protection for the Ben-Gurion Airport.

Credits: IDF Spokesman, Magna bsp Ltd